Skip to content
Circular economy

ESG reporting: how recycling improves your metrics

Your Mexican plant's waste feeds several environmental metrics in your group's ESG report. Here is what they are, how to calculate them and which documents back each number.

By Zikloa TeamPublished 5 min read

Supervisor checking inventory at a paper and cardboard recycling plant

Key takeaway: Recycling drives several environmental metrics in an ESG report: waste generated, waste diverted from disposal and the split by recovery operation. For figures from your Mexico operations to hold up in group consolidation and external assurance, you need actual scale weights, a document for every outbound load and definitions that stay consistent year to year.

For many multinationals, the link between recycling and ESG reporting becomes painfully clear at consolidation time. Headquarters sends a template asking for waste generated, diverted and disposed by site, and the Mexican plant's data is scattered across invoices in Spanish, scale tickets and emails with the recycler. The result is often an approximate number nobody wants to defend in front of an assurance provider.

This article isn't about why to recycle. It's about turning what your Mexico site already recycles into solid metrics: what you'll be asked for, how each figure is calculated, what evidence supports it and which mistakes undermine it.

Where recycling shows up in an ESG report

Waste sits under the "E" in ESG. The most widely used framework for reporting it is GRI 306: Waste 2020, from the Global Reporting Initiative, which organizes information into five disclosures:

  • 306-1 and 306-2: a qualitative description of where waste is generated, its impacts and how you manage them, including the third parties who handle it.
  • 306-3: waste generated, in metric tons.
  • 306-4: waste diverted from disposal, broken down into preparation for reuse, recycling and other recovery operations.
  • 306-5: waste directed to disposal, broken down into incineration (with and without energy recovery), landfilling and other operations.

Both breakdowns separate hazardous from non-hazardous waste, and onsite from offsite handling. Many customer and corporate questionnaires use similar definitions even when they don't cite GRI. If your Mexico data is organized this way, you can answer almost any format with little rework.

On the input side, GRI 301-2 asks for the percentage of recycled input materials used. Recycling counts again there, this time through purchasing.

Key metrics and how to calculate them

Metric Calculation Supporting evidence
Waste generated Sum of weights of all outbound loads in the period Scale tickets, manifests, invoices
Diversion rate Tons diverted from disposal ÷ tons generated × 100 Recycling certificates and destination per stream
Waste intensity Tons generated ÷ unit of production Production data for the same period
Split by operation Tons to reuse, recycling or other recovery Process description on the certificate
Hazardous vs. non-hazardous Tons by classification Classification under NOM-052-SEMARNAT-2005 and manifests
Recycled input share Weight of recycled inputs ÷ total input weight × 100 Data sheets and purchase invoices

Diversion rate gets the headlines, but intensity shows real progress. If output grows, absolute tonnage probably grows too; intensity tells you whether each unit generates less waste than before.

A note on units: Mexican scale tickets and certificates are issued in kilograms and metric tons. If your group reports in short tons or pounds, keep the source data metric, convert once at consolidation and state the conversion in your methodology. Converting at the plant level, month after month, is a common source of small discrepancies that add up.

Evidence: what separates data from estimates

An ESG metric is only as strong as the document behind it. For each outbound load from your Mexican site, aim to have:

  1. A scale weight. Ideally from a certified scale, with a printed or digital ticket that can be reconciled. It's worth understanding why accurate weighing protects both revenue and data.
  2. A transport document or manifest, depending on the waste type and what Mexican regulations require for it.
  3. A recycling certificate stating material, quantity, date and type of process. Check what a recycling certificate should include before accepting one.
  4. An invoice or proof of sale, when the material has commercial value. It's a second, independent source for reconciling weights.

Keep the original Spanish documents and a short translated index. Assurance providers often want to see the source, not a summary.

Mistakes that weaken your metrics

  • Converting cubic meters to tons with assumed densities. A "full" container weighs very differently if it holds loose cardboard, baled cardboard or metal chips.
  • Counting as recycled what went to a mixed-waste hauler. Without separation and proof of destination, you can't claim recovery.
  • Double counting. Scrap you regrind and feed back into your own process isn't waste generated; counting it on both sides inflates generation and diversion.
  • Changing boundaries between years. Adding or removing a building, warehouse or waste type without disclosure breaks comparability.
  • Mapping local categories inconsistently. Mexico distinguishes hazardous, special handling and municipal solid waste; decide once how each maps to your group's categories and document it.
  • Ignoring hazardous waste. It's usually small by weight, but it's what reviewers look at first.

How to genuinely improve the numbers

There are two ways to raise a diversion rate: improve operations or stretch definitions. Only the first survives assurance. The real levers are:

  • Better source separation, so recoverable streams aren't contaminated by general trash and can be sold or reprocessed.
  • Moving up the hierarchy: shift material from "other recovery" to recycling, and from recycling to reuse where possible, for example with returnable pallets and packaging.
  • Reducing generation, not just changing destinations. Cutting process scrap improves intensity even if the diversion rate doesn't move.
  • Adding recycled content to purchasing, which improves the input metric and closes the loop.

The same recycled-tonnage data can later feed avoided-emissions estimates. We explain how in carbon footprint and recycling.

How to organize data throughout the year

The costliest mistake is waiting for year-end. A monthly log with these columns handles most of the work:

  • Shipment date and document number.
  • Stream and material (for example, cardboard, ferrous scrap, PP process scrap).
  • Mexican classification and the group category it maps to.
  • Scale weight and who validated it.
  • Destination and operation type (reuse, recycling, other recovery, disposal).
  • Reference to the certificate or invoice.

Assign a data owner at the plant, reconcile quarterly against invoices and keep all records in one shared repository that HQ can access. If your group's fiscal year differs from the calendar year used for Mexican regulatory filings, tag each record by month so the same data can serve both without being rebuilt.

How Zikloa can help

Zikloa collects and recycles materials from your plant with certified-scale weighing and provides documentation for each service, which makes it easier to feed your ESG log with real data. With our industrial waste collection service in Nuevo León and Mexico City, every outbound load is recorded by material, weight and destination.

If you're preparing your next report and want your recycling streams in order now, talk to our team.

  • #esg
  • #sustainability reporting
  • #waste metrics
  • #recycling

Frequently asked questions

Does incineration with energy recovery count as recycling under GRI 306?

No. Under GRI 306, incineration with or without energy recovery is reported as waste directed to disposal. Only preparation for reuse, recycling and other recovery operations count as waste diverted from disposal.

How do Mexican waste categories map to hazardous and non-hazardous in ESG reports?

Waste classified as hazardous under Mexican rules maps to hazardous. Special handling and municipal solid waste generally map to non-hazardous, but keep the local classification in your records so auditors can trace the mapping.

Which waste metric is most useful for year-over-year comparisons?

Waste intensity, such as kilograms per unit produced. Absolute tonnage moves with production volume; intensity shows whether each unit actually generates less waste than before.

Related articles

Circular economy

Work gloves holding plastic regrind for reprocessingCircular economy

· 5 min read

Ecodesign: designing products with recycling in mind

Design decisions determine whether a product gets recycled or landfilled. Practical criteria for materials, joints, labeling and additives, plus a design-review checklist.

Read article

Contact us

A 360° solution for recycling, processing and material supply

At Zikloa we provide high-quality raw materials and complete collection, processing and recycling services. Our commitment is to deliver sustainable, customized solutions for your business, ensuring efficiency and environmental responsibility.